Monday, November 10, 2014

Pick it Up, Moses!



Exodus 4:2 Then the Lord said to him, "What is that in your hand?"
"A staff," he replied.

It was a tool. It was a symbol of himself—a simple shepherd. The shepherd never went anywhere without his staff. It was his guide, his weapon of defense, and of course it supported him when he was tired. Now God said, "Throw it down!” He threw it down, and it turned into a snake. Moses’ reaction was instinctive. The story reads, "Moses fled.”  You bet he did, and I would have too. He had no love for snakes. Now came the real test of faith. God said, "Pick it up, Moses." Picking up a deadly snake is not a wise thing to do regardless of how the experts do it. God said, "Pick it up by the tail." That leaves the head free to do what it wants to. The Bible doesn't say what Moses said, but I can imagine, "Lord, you don't seem to understand that is a live snake.”  “Lord, you wouldn’t want to kill it first, would you?” The Lord said, “Moses, pick it up."

I have always loved the writing of the British pastor F.B. Meyer who writes:
“What is that in your hand? And he said, a Rod.” It was probably only a shepherd’s crook. What a history, however, awaited it! It was to be stretched out over the Red Sea, pointing a pathway through its depths; to smite the flinty rock; to win victory over the hosts of Amalek; to be known as the Rod of God. When God wants an implement for his service He does not choose the golden scepter, but a shepherd’s crook; the weakest and meanest thing He can find—a ram’s horn, a cake of barley meal, an ox-goad, an earthen pitcher, a shepherd’s sling. He employs a worm to thresh the mountains and make the hills as chaff. A rod with God behind it is mightier than the vastest army.[i]
Notice that God used what was familiar to Moses to teach him an important lesson. Moses’ problem is our problem. He couldn’t see how he was supposed to do what God had asked him to do. God used the stick to say to Moses if I can use this stick, I can use you.


[i] F.B. Meyer, Moses, Christian Literature Crusade, Fort Washington, PA 1984, p. 37.

Tuesday, November 4, 2014

Not Buying It



This week I saw this article posted by John Shore where he emphatically declares there is no such place as a literal hell. Mr. Shore represents a new brand of Christians who know what the Bible really says. They kind of remind me of the Supreme Court that knew what the founders really meant to say, even though they didn’t say it, in regard to abortion. Here is a portion of what Shore says about hell:

The idea that the Bible declares hell a real and literal place is no more valid than the toxic lie that the Bible condemns homosexuality.
Yet the idea that hell is real persists. Why? Because over the centuries those in positions of power within the institutions of Christianity have methodically, relentlessly, and with great art used the doctrine of hell to exploit the innate fear of death that is harbored by one and all.
Show me a Christian terrified of hell, and I’ll show you a Christian ready to pay good money for the assurance that he is not going there. If you don’t think the “doctrine” of hell is about the accrual of money and power, then … then God bless your naiveté.
For the rest of us, it’s certainly worth asking what a Christianity without hell would look like. Well …
A Christianity without hell would be literally fearless…[i]

Mr. Shore gives no real argument for his position of no hell, although I’m sure he has them. However, several questions come to my mind after reading his article. Why does the Bible talk about hell so much? In fact, Jesus spoke of hell more than heaven. The idea of judgment is pervasive in Jesus’ teaching, but all this can be dismissed by an arbitrary statement that it doesn’t exist.

The article states that a real hell is no more valid than the lie that the Bible condemns homosexuality. We get two for one in this article. Mr. Shore and his like-thinking companions know more about what the Bible says than the writers of the Bible, the early church fathers, and thousands of years of traditional Christians who have believed in a literal interpretation of the text. Their intelligence seems to know no limits, and it is as vast as their arrogance.

Mr. Shore says that teaching the doctrine of a literal hell somehow equals revenue for the teachers. What is hard to believe about that is I don’t see very many people preaching about hell these days. The people making money on TV are preaching a Christianity that makes people feel good not bad.

Mr. Shore says a literal hell doesn’t fit with the spirit of Christianity. What he means is that it doesn’t fit with his version of Christianity, and I would certainly agree. However, it does belong in the original version, the one delivered to us by Jesus. I for one am not buying into Mr. Shore’s Christianity. I believe in a savior that saves people from sin—a sin that if not redeemed would send a person to hell.  Yes, I believe sin separates us from God, but it doesn’t have to because Jesus died on the cross to save us and reconcile us to our Father.


[i] http://www.patheos.com/blogs/johnshore/2014/10/what-christianity-without-hell-looks-like/